![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fourth Issue |
||||||||||||
|
A proudly biased and one-sided voters guide: Ripped from the headlines By: Hardly J Tweakle I got to thinking recently about the upcoming election. No, actually, I guess I started to think about this election just a few minutes after the Supreme Court decided the last one. Of course the environment was a non-issue in the 2000 debates, but this is Hardly J Tweakle speaking here, and the environment IS my issue. OK then. Well, no sooner had the last egg been thrown during the Bush inauguration parade than he started to take his revenge on the earth huggers, and man, did he get down and DIRTY. This is just a little of the stuff I dredged up for the Hardly Report (I only wish I had a cool name like Drudge) A few headlines from THIS PAST WEEK -- mind you, this is while Bush is campaigning, when most presidents-to-be would try NOT to offend millions of reasonably minded eco-voters: National forest fees may be permanent If the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act passes Congress this month, the so-called recreational demo fee — requiring people to pay to use some public lands — will become permanent. Bush gives wild places the shaft After almost four years of an unprecedented assault on the wildest places in America, the Bush administration is pulling out the greenwashing brushes so that it can paint a more palatable picture of its environmental policies. But you cannot simply gloss over the scope and magnitude of the Bush administration's assault on America's wild heritage. It's time for a reality check. Wildlife Protection Standards Waived The Bush administration has set aside Reagan-era rules aimed at protecting wildlife in national forests, rules that environmentalists had used to block logging projects in the Pacific Northwest and elsewhere. Wildlife protections on hold Under a temporary rule issued Wednesday by the Bush administration, national forest managers won't have to adhere to strict wildlife protections that have been in place for more than two decades. Decision to pull protection for bull trout brings lawsuit threat Environmental groups say they will sue the federal government over its decision yesterday to remove critical habitat designation for the threatened bull trout in 90 percent of the Columbia and Klamath river basins
01/23/04-- Forest Service drops "survey and manage" rule for loggers 01/09/04-- Pentagon to seek more environmental exemptions 01/09/04-- Forest Service curtails logging appeals process 10/10/03-- New EPA dam proposal threatens salmon 10/10/03-- EPA further delays long overdue Clean Water Act enforcement upgrade 09/12/03-- Private contractors to determine endangered species' future 08/08/03-- Bush administration offers to double logging in Northwest 07/18/03-- Bush asks Supreme Court to overturn roadless protections 05/23/03-- Bush administration cuts wildlife protection, boosts logging in Northwest forests 04/11/03-- Bush administration rolls back wilderness protections 08/23/02-- Bush administration abandons California water plan Key to understanding where W stands on enviro issues are his appointment choices. This list could go on and on, but here’s a few for starters. Never heard of these guys? Well, they’re not exactly the hiking, trekking, let’s-have-some-clean-water-to-roll-around –in-crowd:
*John took the lead in pursuing DoD’s 2002 effort to win broad exemptions for the military from environmental laws, including sonic testing in Puget Sound that sent whales washing up on the shore as they took their last breath.
*In 1987, when the US Fish and Wildlife Service proposed adding the spotted owl to the endangered species list, Cason reportedly said that such a move would be made "over my dead body," and the FWS recommendation was reversed. J. Steven Griles—Deputy Secretary *Griles served as a lobbyist for the coal and oil industry. The National Mining Association said: "He's an ally of the industry...[t]his will hopefully be a breath of fresh air." Gale Norton—Interior Secretary *Secretary Norton was a lead attorney for the Mountain States Legal Foundation, an anti-environmental nonprofit law firm that was the “litigating arm of the Wise Use movement.” The Wise Use movement is a loosely knit network of anti-environmental organizations that seeks to roll back or weaken laws that protect wildlife, habitat, and public lands, as well as health and safety standards for our water, food, and air. *As Attorney General of Colorado, Secretary Norton argued before the Supreme Court that the Endangered Species Act could not and should not be used to prevent the destruction of essential habitat even if that destruction would lead to the death of endangered animals. The Supreme Court rejected this view. Patricia "Lynn" Scarlett—Assistant Secretary, Policy, Management, and Budget *Scarlett has gone on record opposing mandatory curbside recycling, a national bottle bill, campaign finance limits, consumer "right to know" laws, mandatory nutritional labeling, and pesticide use restrictions Rebecca W. Watson—Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management *Watson has spent almost her entire legal career defending extractive industries--specifically, the mining and timber industries--and has been an outspoken advocate on their behalf. Her clients have included Plum Creek Timber Company (the second largest private timberland owner in the U.S.), Redstone Gas Partners (coal bed methane), Seven-Up Pete Joint Ventures (open pit gold mining), and the Western Environmental Trade Association, an industry trade group This paddler is peeved, and can’t imagine more of the same…… so guess who he’s voting for? —ANYBODY BUT BUSH. Hardly J Tweakle
|
|||||||||||||
|
< Back |
|||||||||||||